We aren't as good as SF, CP, NO, SS?

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Starr to Favre and now Aaron Rodgers, we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: salmar80, NCF, JustJeff, packfntk, APB, BF004, mnkcarp

We aren't as good as SF, CP, NO, SS?

Postby Criticuria » Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:13 pm

"The Seahawks, 49ers, Panthers and Saints are better teams than the Packers, but because all of them have very limited salary cap space, Thompson has a chance to get the jump on them this off-season"

Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/ ... z2tDs1zK9E
Follow us: @JournalSentinel on Twitter

The only way this is true is if we're missing Bulaga, CMIII, and Finley. Maybe even with those guys were a step behind Seattle, but we're definately better than New Orleans and the Panthers when healthy.

What's Silverstein thinking? :messedup
Image
Is life as boring as you are?
User avatar
Criticuria
 
Posts: 5883
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:57 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Return to JustJeff's Packers Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests